It is odd that he repeated his previous production of the Henry VI plays but not the Richard III. Anyway, remember that his Hamlet was poor in Stratford but excellent by the time it got to London because they rehearsed it continuously even after it had opened. So, I'd wait and see all the Histories when they arrive in London.
0
RSC Richard III Hit or Miss?
Started by
Guest_Waldo_*
, Feb 18 2007 10:44 PM
-
This topic is locked
14 replies to this topic
#12 Guest_Guest_*
Guest_Guest_*
-
- Guests
Posted 20 February 2007 - 03:42 PM
of couse that is just your silly opinionabout the stratford hamlet and judging by what else you post poor judgement at that
#13 Guest_Guest_*
Guest_Guest_*
-
- Guests
Posted 20 February 2007 - 04:30 PM
I don't always agree with Jan but I likes her. She's certainly got more theatrical knowledge under belt than many people here and she sees through the silly cant of avant garde wannabes like Katie Mitchell.
#15
Jan Brock
-
- Full Members
-
- 2756 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 22 February 2007 - 09:08 AM
Of couse it is just my opinion - what else could it be ? But in this particular instance (and very unusually) my opinion was shared by none other than Michael Billington who said EXACTLY the same thing.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
