Jump to content


* * * * - 10 votes

The Ongoing Wicked Discussion Thread


  • Please log in to reply
7952 replies to this topic

#6241 Titan

Titan

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3396 posts

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:24 PM

generally 'no comment' tends to mean truth and they both have twitter to they could use

#6242 Catqc

Catqc

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 377 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:25 PM

View Posttheaterfan14, on 03 March 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

What a disgusting article, especially for Gina! Ben seems to have problem written all over him in these situations, just out of curiosity was anything said about him and any members of the Legally cast?
This is actually a seriously horrible article for Ben - he was actually aquitted for raping the girl, but in the article it says something like 'he raped the girl on a sunbed' or whatever.

#6243 JD094

JD094

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 207 posts

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:26 PM

No more comments yet. The actual pictures in the paper do look slightly damning though :(
WEST END SHOWS:
2009: The Sound of Music - Oliver!
2010: Jersey Boys - Les Miserables
2011: Jersey Boys - Shrek the Musical
2012: Ghost the Musical - Jersey Boys - Les Miserables - Shrek the Musical - Wicked
2013: Billy Elliot - The Bodyguard - The Book of Mormon - Jersey Boys - Les Miserables - Matilda - The Phantom of the Opera - Viva Forever! - Wicked
2014: Jersey Boys - Les Miserables - Once - The Phantom of the Opera - Wicked

#6244 Catqc

Catqc

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 377 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:26 PM

View PostTitan, on 03 March 2013 - 03:24 PM, said:

generally 'no comment' tends to mean truth and they both have twitter to they could use
Exactly so (and I am NOT saying its true Im just curious) why is everyone denying it here?

#6245 stevepearman

stevepearman

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northants

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:28 PM

Don't you love how a "source" is happy to name people, but never themselves?

#6246 Catqc

Catqc

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 377 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:31 PM

Have the Star published the pictures? Or who?

#6247 isabel

isabel

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1092 posts

Posted 03 March 2013 - 03:39 PM

View PostCatqc, on 03 March 2013 - 03:31 PM, said:

Have the Star published the pictures? Or who?

Yeah, someone tweeted the page from the Star with the picture

#6248 daniel.

daniel.

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 93 posts

Posted 03 March 2013 - 04:16 PM

I really don't want to believe it, but from seeing the photo I will admit it is hard not to.

This is a link to a photograph of the Star article, taken from twitter, for anybody who wants to see it. https://pbs.twimg.co...Bg3CQAEOVHc.jpg

#6249 Titan

Titan

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3396 posts

Posted 03 March 2013 - 04:24 PM

that is pretty damning but not completely clear its him. id say the lack of denial is pretty damning to.

my guess is either they were set up by a member of cast, theatre staff or wicked fan as who else would know who they are.  

also there are elements of the article that hint at someone linked to show (e.g. gina and her clean cut image)

#6250 pastaeater

pastaeater

    Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 03 March 2013 - 04:36 PM

Is she not engaged to someone?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users