Jump to content


Kathryn2

Member Since 21 Jan 2008
Offline Last Active May 12 2013 10:07 AM
-----

#265041 Desperately Seeking The Exit's Questionable Ad Campaign

Posted Kathryn2 on 10 May 2013 - 08:59 PM

View Postvertigo1, on 10 May 2013 - 11:30 AM, said:

My company produced Exit in Manchester so I know how bloody hard he works. Not hiding anything, don't really see what difference it makes

It's nice that you want to defend a
friend/colleague. I'm sure we've all done that ourselves. But it means you're not providing an objective view.

Criticising posters as 'not supporting theatre' when they express their honest opinions about a show's concept or advertising is not going to win Peter or his show any friends. I've been quite intrigued by the idea myself, and thought about getting tickets, but I'm afraid this thread is rather putting me off. I have this aversion to being compared to a Nazi....


#264983 Desperately Seeking The Exit's Questionable Ad Campaign

Posted Kathryn2 on 10 May 2013 - 09:47 AM

View Postblackoutpete, on 10 May 2013 - 07:51 AM, said:

Thanks for all the feedback, fellow theatre-lovers. I was totes unaware that activity like this on this board was frowned upon. Is there any way to delete the thread, so as not to offend?

You don't have to delete the thread now that you've made your involvement clear. You can promote away, as long as you do so without misleading peope.

Your first couple of posts were misleading, hence the rather disgruntled responses from one or two people.

Edit: See, now I'm wondering what Vertigo1's involvement with you/ this show is. That's the result of starting the thread the way you did - it's always positive or defensive comments of the material that end up lacking credibility.

Oh, and Vertigo1, I was absolutely intending to give useful advice about UK copyright law. It's no skin off my nose if Peter Marino gets sued.


#264931 Desperately Seeking The Exit's Questionable Ad Campaign

Posted Kathryn2 on 09 May 2013 - 09:01 PM

View Postblackoutpete, on 08 May 2013 - 01:27 PM, said:

Even if more than 50% of the image is altered?

Uk copyright law is different from US copyright law - there is curently no exception for parody.

http://www.swanturto...px#.UYwNdcqtaO4

Quote

If you do copy, for infringement to take place, you must copy at least a “substantial part” of the original work. Whether or not what you have copied is “substantial” is a qualitative, not quantitative, test. If what you have copied is an original and important part of the first work, copying is likely to be considered substantial.

Copying a substantial part of an original work is difficult to avoid for many parodists. It is often essential, for the parody to be understood, that the original work is easy to identify. Currently these people have to seek and pay for licences.

I'd say that you've copied a substantial part of both of those posters, and that they are technically infringing. Of course, the copyright holders of the original may not decide to sue you - they're unlikely to be seen very widely - but they could if they wanted to.

Oh, and a word to the wise - posting on this board to promote a show without declaring your involvement with it is frowned on by  the regulars here. We've had positive 'reviews' that turned out to be posted by people working for the venue or producers before now. You will get a hostile reaction if people suspect you're using this board in a less-than-honest way.


#263009 Bad Behaviour At A Show

Posted Kathryn2 on 23 April 2013 - 09:59 PM

View Postcraftymiss, on 22 April 2013 - 08:06 AM, said:



I often leave work get the train for a 1hr 20min journey into London. I either plan before hand and take a sandwich to eat on the train or I pick something up from a shop & eat on the hoof on the way there if I'm unable to factor time for a sit down meal.  If not I try to get something to eat prior to the train home.  I usually arrive home at 0130 so could potentially have gone over 12 hours without food, this isnt a hardship if I get to see a show. Im not being a martyr here but showing that someone even with my capacity to eat can do it.

Regarding what people eat during an interval, it can be a problem if they are eating warm pasties and smelly sausages (you'd have to scroll back many tweets to see what I mean by that) as it makes me want to gag. If I was on a tube I could move away unfortunately being confined to a specific seat means moving isn't possible. I also think drinks (other than water) should not be allowed in the auditorium, the smell of cheap but overpriced wine is really something that should be confined to the bar.  I actually just bloody wish people would stop treating the theatre as if they are sat at home on their sofa with their feet up, eating a takeaway and chatting to their family. If that's what you want from a night then stay at home, it's simple.

I actually find this attitude really annoying. So if you're not willing to go without food for 12 hours, not have a drink all night and sit in complete silence you shouldn't go to the theatre?

We wouldn't have a thriving theatre scene if everyone had to meet your standards - people really would stay at home! A night at the theatre is meant to be entertaining, not an endurance test.

I'm as annoyed by anyone else by genuinely disruptive behaviour, but really, if the smell (or sight - ice cream doesn't have a noticeable smell, it's the mere sight of people eating it that offended your sensibilities in your original post) of food and alcohol affects you *that* badly, maybe you should be the one who stays at home. That would certainly represent less of a financial loss to the theatre than everyone else staying away!


#260160 Broadway Questions...

Posted Kathryn2 on 27 March 2013 - 01:48 PM

Might be worth joining Hiptix, if you and your friends are under 35:
http://www.roundabou...ipTix-Info.aspx

It's free to join.


#259127 Peter And Alice

Posted Kathryn2 on 20 March 2013 - 10:55 AM

God, what has happened to this forum?

It used to be a nice place to talk about theatre - just in the past couple of days I've seen snide posts about people who go to shows multiple times, and keeping cats, and people generally playing at being piss artists.


#259120 Peter And Alice

Posted Kathryn2 on 20 March 2013 - 09:58 AM

Well, I'm still only 30, so you'd definitely be wrong about being the youngest! I was in the balcony and didn't notice many grey heads at all in the Balcony or the Upper Circle below.

And I disagree about the actors playing the fictional 'Peter' and 'Alice' - in fact I suspect you rather missed the point if you thought they were 'dreadful' - they were clearly not being played naturalistically because they are meant to be fictional characters.


#258906 Rsc 2013 Season

Posted Kathryn2 on 18 March 2013 - 06:36 PM

View Postigb, on 18 March 2013 - 02:09 PM, said:



I bet she keeps cats.

You know, 8 times is really quite restrained, compared to how often some people who post on this forum go to their favourite show.

It's incredibly restrained compared to how often some on here go to the theatre!

And what's wrong with keeping cats?


#252223 Julius Caesar - Another Bladder Buster?

Posted Kathryn2 on 19 January 2013 - 06:02 PM

Saw this this afternoon. Julius Caesar is a play I have somehow managed to neither see nor read, so I must confess I found it a little tricky to keep track of who was who, and the switch from play to setting and back again was a bit disconcerting.

On the whole I really enjoyed it, though. I thought the woman playing Brutus was terrific, she really drew me into it. The setting worked in a really interesting way and sent me away thinking.


#251776 Theatre Restaurants

Posted Kathryn2 on 13 January 2013 - 05:02 PM

Of course there's nowt wrong with solo eating or theatregoing - as I told the patronising woman who felt compelled to disturb my meal (and my book) with her pity, I wouldn't see half the things I do if I had to organize a companion every time for fear of spending a few hours on my own!




#251040 Jesus Christ Superstar

Posted Kathryn2 on 05 January 2013 - 08:57 PM

I wanted to like it, as I'm a big Tim Minchin fan. But it just didn't do it for me.


#250651 Jesus Christ Superstar

Posted Kathryn2 on 01 January 2013 - 11:49 PM

I'm actually quite shocked - I'm a big Tim Minchin fan, but his Judas just lacked any nuance. Mel C was, well, Mel C, the staging annoyed me, and even the subtlety of the score was lost.

Gethsemane was more like a teenager throwing a strop than a man having a spiritual crisis.


#250648 Jesus Christ Superstar

Posted Kathryn2 on 01 January 2013 - 11:17 PM

Dear Lord (Webber), when Chris Moyles is one of the best bits of your show you have a problem.


#250499 Julius Caesar - Another Bladder Buster?

Posted Kathryn2 on 31 December 2012 - 10:20 AM

I just snagged a seat in the side circle via the Front row scheme. Dissapointed to realise that a stalls seat came free just after I finished buying it - it seems that 10.10am is the best time to try, rather than dead on 10am!

Oh well, at least for £10 I'm no worse off than I would have been day-seating, and didn't have to get up ridiculously early and queue in the cold for it.


#248744 Viva Forever!

Posted Kathryn2 on 12 December 2012 - 01:56 PM

View Postpopcultureboy, on 12 December 2012 - 12:43 PM, said:

"Yes WWRY did get terrible reviews and it is still running 10 years later!"

Yes, but in the beginning, the sales were so negatively affected by the reviews, everyone in the show was informed they would be closing by September if things didn't turn around. Then they performed at the Queen's Jubilee concert and it took off from there. Somehow, I don't think VIVA FOREVER will be able to pull that miracle off as the word of mouth from pretty much everyone is as horrific as the reviews. But then Judy Craymer has enough money to keep the show running at a loss for about 85 years, so who knows?

The thing about WWRY is that it's got some genuinely brilliant songs incredibly well-sung, and, since Freddy Mercury is sadly no longer with us, people don't have the opportunity to see the original versions performed live any more. Plus, there's a nice little tribute to the man himself in there. And althought the plot is nonsensical, it is quite funny in places. It's basically sing-along-a-Queen, and occasionally Brian May even turns up on stage to join in.

The Spice Girls are all alive and kicking, and reformed for a tour not so long ago - which didn't get great reviews. Really dedicated Spice fans are more likely to want to see the real thing than a pale imitation, especially if the songs are not well arranged or perfromed.